COURT RULING ON VACCINE SIDE EFFECTS

입력 2022.09.21 (15:23) 수정 2022.09.21 (16:45)

읽어주기 기능은 크롬기반의
브라우저에서만 사용하실 수 있습니다.

[Anchor Lead]

The first court ruling has come out, ordering state compensation to a man who was diagnosed with cerebral hemorrhage after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine shot. The court said it is difficult not to acknowledge a causal link to the vaccine in the absence of evidence suggesting the disease was caused by other reasons.

[Pkg]

A patient received an AstraZeneca shot last April. He developed a fever the very next day and also felt dizziness and numbness in legs. He went for a checkup at a hospital which alerted his case to a public health center, believing it concerned vaccine side effects. In follow-up examinations, the patient was diagnosed with cerebral hemorrhage and cerebrovascular malformation. His family applied for compensation of some 3.6 million won with the KDCA to cover hospital fees, but was denied payment. The KDCA refused to recognize a causal relationship between his condition and vaccination. It said that numbness in the legs is a main symptom of brain disease and has little to do with the coronavirus vaccine. However the court saw it differently. The court said the patient, who was a healthy person, displayed fever and headaches the day after receiving the shot and the development coincides with vaccine side effects mentioned by the government. The court also mentioned it is difficult to definitively deny an epidemiological connection between the diagnosis and vaccine without evidence suggesting the disease was caused by some other reasons. The ruling implies that adverse effects of vaccination must be acknowledged even though a causal link cannot be clearly proven.

[Soundbite] Hwang Da-yeon(Advisory attorney, KBS) : "The court believed a causal relationship can be deduced based on several indirect facts. This can be seen as setting a standard for other similar compensation requests."

The ruling comes 17 months after the abnormal vaccine reaction was first reported. The KDCA appealed the court decision and vowed to make its case based on medical grounds. Currently, eight other compensation lawsuits are also proceeding related to COVID-19 vaccine side effects.

■ 제보하기
▷ 카카오톡 : 'KBS제보' 검색, 채널 추가
▷ 전화 : 02-781-1234, 4444
▷ 이메일 : kbs1234@kbs.co.kr
▷ 유튜브, 네이버, 카카오에서도 KBS뉴스를 구독해주세요!


  • COURT RULING ON VACCINE SIDE EFFECTS
    • 입력 2022-09-21 15:23:05
    • 수정2022-09-21 16:45:17
    News Today
[Anchor Lead]

The first court ruling has come out, ordering state compensation to a man who was diagnosed with cerebral hemorrhage after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine shot. The court said it is difficult not to acknowledge a causal link to the vaccine in the absence of evidence suggesting the disease was caused by other reasons.

[Pkg]

A patient received an AstraZeneca shot last April. He developed a fever the very next day and also felt dizziness and numbness in legs. He went for a checkup at a hospital which alerted his case to a public health center, believing it concerned vaccine side effects. In follow-up examinations, the patient was diagnosed with cerebral hemorrhage and cerebrovascular malformation. His family applied for compensation of some 3.6 million won with the KDCA to cover hospital fees, but was denied payment. The KDCA refused to recognize a causal relationship between his condition and vaccination. It said that numbness in the legs is a main symptom of brain disease and has little to do with the coronavirus vaccine. However the court saw it differently. The court said the patient, who was a healthy person, displayed fever and headaches the day after receiving the shot and the development coincides with vaccine side effects mentioned by the government. The court also mentioned it is difficult to definitively deny an epidemiological connection between the diagnosis and vaccine without evidence suggesting the disease was caused by some other reasons. The ruling implies that adverse effects of vaccination must be acknowledged even though a causal link cannot be clearly proven.

[Soundbite] Hwang Da-yeon(Advisory attorney, KBS) : "The court believed a causal relationship can be deduced based on several indirect facts. This can be seen as setting a standard for other similar compensation requests."

The ruling comes 17 months after the abnormal vaccine reaction was first reported. The KDCA appealed the court decision and vowed to make its case based on medical grounds. Currently, eight other compensation lawsuits are also proceeding related to COVID-19 vaccine side effects.

이 기사가 좋으셨다면

오늘의 핫 클릭

실시간 뜨거운 관심을 받고 있는 뉴스

이 기사에 대한 의견을 남겨주세요.

수신료 수신료