Controversy sparks over National Assembly prosecution’s withdrawal of insurrection charges

입력 2025.01.04 (22:48)

읽어주기 기능은 크롬기반의
브라우저에서만 사용하실 수 있습니다.

[Anchor]

Now, we will look into the impeachment trial of President Yoon.

The National Assembly's impeachment prosecution team has announced that they will remove the charges of insurrection from the reasons for impeaching President Yoon.

In response, President Yoon's side stated that if that is the case, a new vote on impeachment must be held.

This has sparked controversy.

It is expected to be clarified at the first hearing scheduled for December 14th.

Choi Min-young reports.

[Report]

The impeachment trial of President Yoon was initially set to be divided into two parts: 'violation of the constitution' due to the unconstitutional declaration of martial law, and 'violation of the criminal law' including insurrection charges.

However, the National Assembly's impeachment prosecution team announced on the 27th of December during the first preparatory hearing that they would withdraw their claim that actions related to emergency martial law constitute insurrection.

[Kim Jin-han/National Assembly representative/Dec. 27: "We are concerned that the constitutional trial might transform into a criminal trial. Therefore, we would like to keep it as much as possible in line with the nature of constitutional trials...."]

Then, during the second preparatory hearing held yesterday, President Yoon's side argued that if the impeachment prosecution team is abandoning the insurrection charges, "a re-vote in the National Assembly is necessary."

[Choi Geo-hun/Representative for President Yoon/Dec. 3: "Insurrection is a crime under criminal law, not constitutional law. Therefore, it is not valid at all to change the issue of insurrection from a criminal law issue to a constitutional issue."]

When the impeachment prosecution team was asked by the court whether they were confirming that they were withdrawing the claim that actions related to emergency martial law constitute insurrection under criminal law, they replied, "Yes."

President Yoon's side again protested whether it is fundamentally possible to judge impeachment without evaluating insurrection, to which Justice Lee Ji-sun responded, "We are studying it, so don't worry."

The controversy regarding the withdrawal of insurrection charges is expected to be resolved at the first hearing scheduled for the 14th.

KBS News, Choi Min-young.

■ 제보하기
▷ 카카오톡 : 'KBS제보' 검색, 채널 추가
▷ 전화 : 02-781-1234, 4444
▷ 이메일 : kbs1234@kbs.co.kr
▷ 유튜브, 네이버, 카카오에서도 KBS뉴스를 구독해주세요!


  • Controversy sparks over National Assembly prosecution’s withdrawal of insurrection charges
    • 입력 2025-01-04 22:48:46
    News 9
[Anchor]

Now, we will look into the impeachment trial of President Yoon.

The National Assembly's impeachment prosecution team has announced that they will remove the charges of insurrection from the reasons for impeaching President Yoon.

In response, President Yoon's side stated that if that is the case, a new vote on impeachment must be held.

This has sparked controversy.

It is expected to be clarified at the first hearing scheduled for December 14th.

Choi Min-young reports.

[Report]

The impeachment trial of President Yoon was initially set to be divided into two parts: 'violation of the constitution' due to the unconstitutional declaration of martial law, and 'violation of the criminal law' including insurrection charges.

However, the National Assembly's impeachment prosecution team announced on the 27th of December during the first preparatory hearing that they would withdraw their claim that actions related to emergency martial law constitute insurrection.

[Kim Jin-han/National Assembly representative/Dec. 27: "We are concerned that the constitutional trial might transform into a criminal trial. Therefore, we would like to keep it as much as possible in line with the nature of constitutional trials...."]

Then, during the second preparatory hearing held yesterday, President Yoon's side argued that if the impeachment prosecution team is abandoning the insurrection charges, "a re-vote in the National Assembly is necessary."

[Choi Geo-hun/Representative for President Yoon/Dec. 3: "Insurrection is a crime under criminal law, not constitutional law. Therefore, it is not valid at all to change the issue of insurrection from a criminal law issue to a constitutional issue."]

When the impeachment prosecution team was asked by the court whether they were confirming that they were withdrawing the claim that actions related to emergency martial law constitute insurrection under criminal law, they replied, "Yes."

President Yoon's side again protested whether it is fundamentally possible to judge impeachment without evaluating insurrection, to which Justice Lee Ji-sun responded, "We are studying it, so don't worry."

The controversy regarding the withdrawal of insurrection charges is expected to be resolved at the first hearing scheduled for the 14th.

KBS News, Choi Min-young.

이 기사가 좋으셨다면

오늘의 핫 클릭

실시간 뜨거운 관심을 받고 있는 뉴스

이 기사에 대한 의견을 남겨주세요.

수신료 수신료