Heated debate over insurrection charge
입력 2025.01.07 (23:52)
읽어주기 기능은 크롬기반의
브라우저에서만 사용하실 수 있습니다.
[Anchor]
The fallout from the withdrawal of the insurrection charge has led to a public dispute between the National Assembly's impeachment committee and President Yoon's side.
The Constitutional Court stated that this controversy is a matter for the court to decide.
Hwang Hyun-kyu reports.
[Report]
President Yoon Suk Yeol's side claimed that the National Assembly's impeachment committee changed the grounds for impeachment, arguing that this constitutes a reason for dismissing the impeachment.
Since the impeachment resolution mentions insurrection in significant parts, withdrawing the insurrection charge would mean a substantial change in the grounds for impeachment.
They emphasized that without judging the insurrection charge under criminal law, it is impossible to determine whether there is a violation of the constitution.
[Choi Geo-hun/Representative of President Yoon/Jan. 3: "Insurrection is a crime under criminal law, not a crime under constitutional law. Therefore, it is entirely unreasonable to change the issue of insurrection under criminal law to a constitutional issue."]
The National Assembly's impeachment committee held a press conference, asserting that "not a single detail of the impeachment facts has been changed."
They claimed that the core of the impeachment resolution is the act of violating the constitution due to emergency martial law, and they sought the Constitutional Court's judgment on this matter.
Furthermore, they stated that since the grounds for impeachment have not changed, a re-vote in the National Assembly is unnecessary.
[Jang Soon-wook/Representative of the National Assembly: "Not a single letter of the impeachment facts has been retracted or changed during the preparation process. The insurrection acts will be thoroughly judged."]
The Constitutional Court briefly stated that this controversy is "a matter for the court to decide."
With the first formal hearing date approaching in a week, the Constitutional Court expressed its stance on the fairness controversy raised by some, stating, "Creating new disputes over the Constitutional Court's decisions, made to resolve constitutional disputes, would not reflect the will of the voters."
KBS News, Hwang Hyun-kyu.
The fallout from the withdrawal of the insurrection charge has led to a public dispute between the National Assembly's impeachment committee and President Yoon's side.
The Constitutional Court stated that this controversy is a matter for the court to decide.
Hwang Hyun-kyu reports.
[Report]
President Yoon Suk Yeol's side claimed that the National Assembly's impeachment committee changed the grounds for impeachment, arguing that this constitutes a reason for dismissing the impeachment.
Since the impeachment resolution mentions insurrection in significant parts, withdrawing the insurrection charge would mean a substantial change in the grounds for impeachment.
They emphasized that without judging the insurrection charge under criminal law, it is impossible to determine whether there is a violation of the constitution.
[Choi Geo-hun/Representative of President Yoon/Jan. 3: "Insurrection is a crime under criminal law, not a crime under constitutional law. Therefore, it is entirely unreasonable to change the issue of insurrection under criminal law to a constitutional issue."]
The National Assembly's impeachment committee held a press conference, asserting that "not a single detail of the impeachment facts has been changed."
They claimed that the core of the impeachment resolution is the act of violating the constitution due to emergency martial law, and they sought the Constitutional Court's judgment on this matter.
Furthermore, they stated that since the grounds for impeachment have not changed, a re-vote in the National Assembly is unnecessary.
[Jang Soon-wook/Representative of the National Assembly: "Not a single letter of the impeachment facts has been retracted or changed during the preparation process. The insurrection acts will be thoroughly judged."]
The Constitutional Court briefly stated that this controversy is "a matter for the court to decide."
With the first formal hearing date approaching in a week, the Constitutional Court expressed its stance on the fairness controversy raised by some, stating, "Creating new disputes over the Constitutional Court's decisions, made to resolve constitutional disputes, would not reflect the will of the voters."
KBS News, Hwang Hyun-kyu.
■ 제보하기
▷ 카카오톡 : 'KBS제보' 검색, 채널 추가
▷ 전화 : 02-781-1234, 4444
▷ 이메일 : kbs1234@kbs.co.kr
▷ 유튜브, 네이버, 카카오에서도 KBS뉴스를 구독해주세요!
- Heated debate over insurrection charge
-
- 입력 2025-01-07 23:52:13

[Anchor]
The fallout from the withdrawal of the insurrection charge has led to a public dispute between the National Assembly's impeachment committee and President Yoon's side.
The Constitutional Court stated that this controversy is a matter for the court to decide.
Hwang Hyun-kyu reports.
[Report]
President Yoon Suk Yeol's side claimed that the National Assembly's impeachment committee changed the grounds for impeachment, arguing that this constitutes a reason for dismissing the impeachment.
Since the impeachment resolution mentions insurrection in significant parts, withdrawing the insurrection charge would mean a substantial change in the grounds for impeachment.
They emphasized that without judging the insurrection charge under criminal law, it is impossible to determine whether there is a violation of the constitution.
[Choi Geo-hun/Representative of President Yoon/Jan. 3: "Insurrection is a crime under criminal law, not a crime under constitutional law. Therefore, it is entirely unreasonable to change the issue of insurrection under criminal law to a constitutional issue."]
The National Assembly's impeachment committee held a press conference, asserting that "not a single detail of the impeachment facts has been changed."
They claimed that the core of the impeachment resolution is the act of violating the constitution due to emergency martial law, and they sought the Constitutional Court's judgment on this matter.
Furthermore, they stated that since the grounds for impeachment have not changed, a re-vote in the National Assembly is unnecessary.
[Jang Soon-wook/Representative of the National Assembly: "Not a single letter of the impeachment facts has been retracted or changed during the preparation process. The insurrection acts will be thoroughly judged."]
The Constitutional Court briefly stated that this controversy is "a matter for the court to decide."
With the first formal hearing date approaching in a week, the Constitutional Court expressed its stance on the fairness controversy raised by some, stating, "Creating new disputes over the Constitutional Court's decisions, made to resolve constitutional disputes, would not reflect the will of the voters."
KBS News, Hwang Hyun-kyu.
The fallout from the withdrawal of the insurrection charge has led to a public dispute between the National Assembly's impeachment committee and President Yoon's side.
The Constitutional Court stated that this controversy is a matter for the court to decide.
Hwang Hyun-kyu reports.
[Report]
President Yoon Suk Yeol's side claimed that the National Assembly's impeachment committee changed the grounds for impeachment, arguing that this constitutes a reason for dismissing the impeachment.
Since the impeachment resolution mentions insurrection in significant parts, withdrawing the insurrection charge would mean a substantial change in the grounds for impeachment.
They emphasized that without judging the insurrection charge under criminal law, it is impossible to determine whether there is a violation of the constitution.
[Choi Geo-hun/Representative of President Yoon/Jan. 3: "Insurrection is a crime under criminal law, not a crime under constitutional law. Therefore, it is entirely unreasonable to change the issue of insurrection under criminal law to a constitutional issue."]
The National Assembly's impeachment committee held a press conference, asserting that "not a single detail of the impeachment facts has been changed."
They claimed that the core of the impeachment resolution is the act of violating the constitution due to emergency martial law, and they sought the Constitutional Court's judgment on this matter.
Furthermore, they stated that since the grounds for impeachment have not changed, a re-vote in the National Assembly is unnecessary.
[Jang Soon-wook/Representative of the National Assembly: "Not a single letter of the impeachment facts has been retracted or changed during the preparation process. The insurrection acts will be thoroughly judged."]
The Constitutional Court briefly stated that this controversy is "a matter for the court to decide."
With the first formal hearing date approaching in a week, the Constitutional Court expressed its stance on the fairness controversy raised by some, stating, "Creating new disputes over the Constitutional Court's decisions, made to resolve constitutional disputes, would not reflect the will of the voters."
KBS News, Hwang Hyun-kyu.
-
-
황현규 기자 help@kbs.co.kr
황현규 기자의 기사 모음
-
이 기사가 좋으셨다면
-
좋아요
0
-
응원해요
0
-
후속 원해요
0
이 기사에 대한 의견을 남겨주세요.