Judicial Power Abuse

입력 2018.08.16 (15:05) 수정 2018.08.16 (15:26)

읽어주기 기능은 크롬기반의
브라우저에서만 사용하실 수 있습니다.

[Anchor Lead]

The prosecution has conducted its first search related to allegations the National Court Administration under the previous administration intervened in a court trial involving a Busan-based building contractor. The court has so far rejected all search warrants requested for former and incumbent judges implicated in the judicial power abuse scandal.

[Pkg]

Prosecutors have searched the offices of a former justice at the Busan High Court known by the surname Moon and the offices of a building contractor surnamed Jung. The raid marked the first search conducted in the investigation looking into alleged interference by the National Court Administration in a bribery trial surrounding the building contractor. The former judge Moon is accused of receiving favors from the businessman Jung on several occasions. A document drafted by the National Court Administration in September 2016 states that Moon may have been involved in Jung's first trial. The document said at least the appeals trial must be properly held and urged for a court decision after one or two more trials. Prosecutors have also obtained a verbal record showing the chief of the National Court Administration asking the head of the Busan High Court to delay the trial in question. The prosecution believes the NCA intervened in the trial after a local daily began to cover corruption allegations of Judge Moon. Circumstantial evidence also indicates the NCA tried to block the reporting with help from then presidential secretary for political affairs Hyun Ki-hwan who had ties with the judge. Prosecutors believe the NCA interfered in the case to cover up the judge's irregularities and gain assistance from the presidential aide for the establishment of an appellate court. However, the issuance of search warrants requested for former and incumbent judges related to this case have all been rejected. The prosecution strongly protests the rejection as unjustified, saying that facts have been confirmed through testimonies from judges who have been questioned.

■ 제보하기
▷ 카카오톡 : 'KBS제보' 검색, 채널 추가
▷ 전화 : 02-781-1234, 4444
▷ 이메일 : kbs1234@kbs.co.kr
▷ 유튜브, 네이버, 카카오에서도 KBS뉴스를 구독해주세요!


  • Judicial Power Abuse
    • 입력 2018-08-16 14:58:55
    • 수정2018-08-16 15:26:08
    News Today
[Anchor Lead]

The prosecution has conducted its first search related to allegations the National Court Administration under the previous administration intervened in a court trial involving a Busan-based building contractor. The court has so far rejected all search warrants requested for former and incumbent judges implicated in the judicial power abuse scandal.

[Pkg]

Prosecutors have searched the offices of a former justice at the Busan High Court known by the surname Moon and the offices of a building contractor surnamed Jung. The raid marked the first search conducted in the investigation looking into alleged interference by the National Court Administration in a bribery trial surrounding the building contractor. The former judge Moon is accused of receiving favors from the businessman Jung on several occasions. A document drafted by the National Court Administration in September 2016 states that Moon may have been involved in Jung's first trial. The document said at least the appeals trial must be properly held and urged for a court decision after one or two more trials. Prosecutors have also obtained a verbal record showing the chief of the National Court Administration asking the head of the Busan High Court to delay the trial in question. The prosecution believes the NCA intervened in the trial after a local daily began to cover corruption allegations of Judge Moon. Circumstantial evidence also indicates the NCA tried to block the reporting with help from then presidential secretary for political affairs Hyun Ki-hwan who had ties with the judge. Prosecutors believe the NCA interfered in the case to cover up the judge's irregularities and gain assistance from the presidential aide for the establishment of an appellate court. However, the issuance of search warrants requested for former and incumbent judges related to this case have all been rejected. The prosecution strongly protests the rejection as unjustified, saying that facts have been confirmed through testimonies from judges who have been questioned.

이 기사가 좋으셨다면

오늘의 핫 클릭

실시간 뜨거운 관심을 받고 있는 뉴스

이 기사에 대한 의견을 남겨주세요.

수신료 수신료