YOON VETOES DISPUTED GRAIN BILL

입력 2023.04.04 (15:11) 수정 2023.04.04 (16:45)

읽어주기 기능은 크롬기반의
브라우저에서만 사용하실 수 있습니다.

[Anchor Lead]

During the cabinet meeting presided over by President Yoon Suk Yeol, a request for reconsideration, in other words, the exercise of veto power, was approved regarding the amendment to the Grain Management Act. President Yoon explained that the amended Grain Management Act represents a typical populist bill that does not contribute to the development of agriculture.

[Pkg]

During a Cabinet meeting Tuesday, President Yoon Suk Yeol said it was regrettable that a revision to the Grain Management Act was unilaterally approved in parliament without proper discussions. He said the government has consistently warned of the side effects of the legislation, which he said was a classic example of populism that hinders the advancement of the agriculture sector.

[Soundbite] Yoon Suk Yeol(President) : "It's a typical populist bill doesn't help farmers or the development of farming villages. It also goes against the government's agricultural goals."

Yoon said the bill forcibly requires the government to buy all leftover rice using taxpayers' money regardless of rice consumption in the market. He said, citing an expert survey, that subsequent overproduction of rice will eventually further reduce prices and destabilize farming income. He said his decision to veto the bill is the result of such a review and opinions gathered on the issue.

[Soundbite] Yoon Suk Yeol(President) : "After the bill’s passage, 40 farmers groups have requested a debate on the revision as well as related agencies and the ruling party."

Yoon has exercised the right to veto the legislation after the Cabinet voted to have the bill sent back to parliament. This marks the first presidential veto in seven years and the 67th overall in the nation’s constitutional history. If the vetoed bill is sent back to the National Assembly, it must win two-thirds approval in a vote by a majority of lawmakers attending in order to pass. However, a passage is unlikely due to the ruling party’s opposition, and therefore the bill will most likely be scrapped. The main opposition Democratic Party, which led the bill’s initial passage, has vowed to introduce additional, similar bills.

■ 제보하기
▷ 카카오톡 : 'KBS제보' 검색, 채널 추가
▷ 전화 : 02-781-1234, 4444
▷ 이메일 : kbs1234@kbs.co.kr
▷ 유튜브, 네이버, 카카오에서도 KBS뉴스를 구독해주세요!


  • YOON VETOES DISPUTED GRAIN BILL
    • 입력 2023-04-04 15:11:08
    • 수정2023-04-04 16:45:22
    News Today
[Anchor Lead]

During the cabinet meeting presided over by President Yoon Suk Yeol, a request for reconsideration, in other words, the exercise of veto power, was approved regarding the amendment to the Grain Management Act. President Yoon explained that the amended Grain Management Act represents a typical populist bill that does not contribute to the development of agriculture.

[Pkg]

During a Cabinet meeting Tuesday, President Yoon Suk Yeol said it was regrettable that a revision to the Grain Management Act was unilaterally approved in parliament without proper discussions. He said the government has consistently warned of the side effects of the legislation, which he said was a classic example of populism that hinders the advancement of the agriculture sector.

[Soundbite] Yoon Suk Yeol(President) : "It's a typical populist bill doesn't help farmers or the development of farming villages. It also goes against the government's agricultural goals."

Yoon said the bill forcibly requires the government to buy all leftover rice using taxpayers' money regardless of rice consumption in the market. He said, citing an expert survey, that subsequent overproduction of rice will eventually further reduce prices and destabilize farming income. He said his decision to veto the bill is the result of such a review and opinions gathered on the issue.

[Soundbite] Yoon Suk Yeol(President) : "After the bill’s passage, 40 farmers groups have requested a debate on the revision as well as related agencies and the ruling party."

Yoon has exercised the right to veto the legislation after the Cabinet voted to have the bill sent back to parliament. This marks the first presidential veto in seven years and the 67th overall in the nation’s constitutional history. If the vetoed bill is sent back to the National Assembly, it must win two-thirds approval in a vote by a majority of lawmakers attending in order to pass. However, a passage is unlikely due to the ruling party’s opposition, and therefore the bill will most likely be scrapped. The main opposition Democratic Party, which led the bill’s initial passage, has vowed to introduce additional, similar bills.

이 기사가 좋으셨다면

오늘의 핫 클릭

실시간 뜨거운 관심을 받고 있는 뉴스

이 기사에 대한 의견을 남겨주세요.

수신료 수신료