NSO internal bulletin posting deleted
입력 2025.01.11 (22:28)
읽어주기 기능은 크롬기반의
브라우저에서만 사용하실 수 있습니다.
[Anchor]
In the meantime, it has been confirmed that there was a post uploaded to the internal bulletin board of the Security Office, pointing out the illegality of obstructing the execution of a warrant.
However, this post was reportedly deleted at the direction of Kim Seong-hoon, the deputy chief of the Security Office.
This is an exclusive report by Shin Ji-hye.
[Report]
Today (Jan. 11), a three-page post was uploaded to the internal network accessible only to Security Office employees.
It stated that "the execution of an arrest warrant by investigative agencies is considered a legitimate act in the course of duty" and that "the use of physical force against it constitutes obstruction of official duties."
It also mentioned that the issue of the legality of the arrest warrant for President Yoon has been resolved by the statement of the Chief of the Court Administration.
[Cheon Dae-yeop/Chief of Court Administration/Jan. 7: "For trials conducted in accordance with proper procedures, we should respect that, and disputes regarding it should be resolved within the procedures, which I believe is the essence of our rule of law."]
The post also argued that "the execution of a warrant by investigative agencies cannot be seen as a 'threat to the protected person' under the Security Act and should be complied with."
The author emphasized that "blocking the execution of a warrant under the pretext of protecting the residence is also difficult to recognize as a 'legitimate act'."
It has been reported that Kim Seong-hoon, who is classified as 'uncompromising', expressed his intention to obstruct the illegal execution of the warrant, while the post uploaded had opposing content.
As soon as this post was shared, Kim ordered its immediate deletion.
However, the head of the department to which the author belongs refused, and ultimately, it was confirmed that a staff member in charge of IT forcibly deleted the post.
With a second warrant execution approaching, it seems that there is a controversy over legality even within the Security Office.
Former Chief Park Chong-jun, whose resignation was accepted, was also confirmed to be aware of the 'illegality' controversy, as he reviewed whether obstructing investigative personnel with a 'human shield' was lawful.
This is KBS News, Shin Ji-hye.
In the meantime, it has been confirmed that there was a post uploaded to the internal bulletin board of the Security Office, pointing out the illegality of obstructing the execution of a warrant.
However, this post was reportedly deleted at the direction of Kim Seong-hoon, the deputy chief of the Security Office.
This is an exclusive report by Shin Ji-hye.
[Report]
Today (Jan. 11), a three-page post was uploaded to the internal network accessible only to Security Office employees.
It stated that "the execution of an arrest warrant by investigative agencies is considered a legitimate act in the course of duty" and that "the use of physical force against it constitutes obstruction of official duties."
It also mentioned that the issue of the legality of the arrest warrant for President Yoon has been resolved by the statement of the Chief of the Court Administration.
[Cheon Dae-yeop/Chief of Court Administration/Jan. 7: "For trials conducted in accordance with proper procedures, we should respect that, and disputes regarding it should be resolved within the procedures, which I believe is the essence of our rule of law."]
The post also argued that "the execution of a warrant by investigative agencies cannot be seen as a 'threat to the protected person' under the Security Act and should be complied with."
The author emphasized that "blocking the execution of a warrant under the pretext of protecting the residence is also difficult to recognize as a 'legitimate act'."
It has been reported that Kim Seong-hoon, who is classified as 'uncompromising', expressed his intention to obstruct the illegal execution of the warrant, while the post uploaded had opposing content.
As soon as this post was shared, Kim ordered its immediate deletion.
However, the head of the department to which the author belongs refused, and ultimately, it was confirmed that a staff member in charge of IT forcibly deleted the post.
With a second warrant execution approaching, it seems that there is a controversy over legality even within the Security Office.
Former Chief Park Chong-jun, whose resignation was accepted, was also confirmed to be aware of the 'illegality' controversy, as he reviewed whether obstructing investigative personnel with a 'human shield' was lawful.
This is KBS News, Shin Ji-hye.
■ 제보하기
▷ 카카오톡 : 'KBS제보' 검색, 채널 추가
▷ 전화 : 02-781-1234, 4444
▷ 이메일 : kbs1234@kbs.co.kr
▷ 유튜브, 네이버, 카카오에서도 KBS뉴스를 구독해주세요!
- NSO internal bulletin posting deleted
-
- 입력 2025-01-11 22:28:31
[Anchor]
In the meantime, it has been confirmed that there was a post uploaded to the internal bulletin board of the Security Office, pointing out the illegality of obstructing the execution of a warrant.
However, this post was reportedly deleted at the direction of Kim Seong-hoon, the deputy chief of the Security Office.
This is an exclusive report by Shin Ji-hye.
[Report]
Today (Jan. 11), a three-page post was uploaded to the internal network accessible only to Security Office employees.
It stated that "the execution of an arrest warrant by investigative agencies is considered a legitimate act in the course of duty" and that "the use of physical force against it constitutes obstruction of official duties."
It also mentioned that the issue of the legality of the arrest warrant for President Yoon has been resolved by the statement of the Chief of the Court Administration.
[Cheon Dae-yeop/Chief of Court Administration/Jan. 7: "For trials conducted in accordance with proper procedures, we should respect that, and disputes regarding it should be resolved within the procedures, which I believe is the essence of our rule of law."]
The post also argued that "the execution of a warrant by investigative agencies cannot be seen as a 'threat to the protected person' under the Security Act and should be complied with."
The author emphasized that "blocking the execution of a warrant under the pretext of protecting the residence is also difficult to recognize as a 'legitimate act'."
It has been reported that Kim Seong-hoon, who is classified as 'uncompromising', expressed his intention to obstruct the illegal execution of the warrant, while the post uploaded had opposing content.
As soon as this post was shared, Kim ordered its immediate deletion.
However, the head of the department to which the author belongs refused, and ultimately, it was confirmed that a staff member in charge of IT forcibly deleted the post.
With a second warrant execution approaching, it seems that there is a controversy over legality even within the Security Office.
Former Chief Park Chong-jun, whose resignation was accepted, was also confirmed to be aware of the 'illegality' controversy, as he reviewed whether obstructing investigative personnel with a 'human shield' was lawful.
This is KBS News, Shin Ji-hye.
In the meantime, it has been confirmed that there was a post uploaded to the internal bulletin board of the Security Office, pointing out the illegality of obstructing the execution of a warrant.
However, this post was reportedly deleted at the direction of Kim Seong-hoon, the deputy chief of the Security Office.
This is an exclusive report by Shin Ji-hye.
[Report]
Today (Jan. 11), a three-page post was uploaded to the internal network accessible only to Security Office employees.
It stated that "the execution of an arrest warrant by investigative agencies is considered a legitimate act in the course of duty" and that "the use of physical force against it constitutes obstruction of official duties."
It also mentioned that the issue of the legality of the arrest warrant for President Yoon has been resolved by the statement of the Chief of the Court Administration.
[Cheon Dae-yeop/Chief of Court Administration/Jan. 7: "For trials conducted in accordance with proper procedures, we should respect that, and disputes regarding it should be resolved within the procedures, which I believe is the essence of our rule of law."]
The post also argued that "the execution of a warrant by investigative agencies cannot be seen as a 'threat to the protected person' under the Security Act and should be complied with."
The author emphasized that "blocking the execution of a warrant under the pretext of protecting the residence is also difficult to recognize as a 'legitimate act'."
It has been reported that Kim Seong-hoon, who is classified as 'uncompromising', expressed his intention to obstruct the illegal execution of the warrant, while the post uploaded had opposing content.
As soon as this post was shared, Kim ordered its immediate deletion.
However, the head of the department to which the author belongs refused, and ultimately, it was confirmed that a staff member in charge of IT forcibly deleted the post.
With a second warrant execution approaching, it seems that there is a controversy over legality even within the Security Office.
Former Chief Park Chong-jun, whose resignation was accepted, was also confirmed to be aware of the 'illegality' controversy, as he reviewed whether obstructing investigative personnel with a 'human shield' was lawful.
This is KBS News, Shin Ji-hye.
-
-
신지혜 기자 new@kbs.co.kr
신지혜 기자의 기사 모음
-
이 기사가 좋으셨다면
-
좋아요
0
-
응원해요
0
-
후속 원해요
0
이 기사에 대한 의견을 남겨주세요.