Parties divided on judge appointment

입력 2025.02.02 (23:40)

읽어주기 기능은 크롬기반의
브라우저에서만 사용하실 수 있습니다.

[Anchor]

As the decision approaches, the voices of both the ruling and opposition parties have grown louder.

The People Power Party stated that regardless of the Constitutional Court's decision, the appointment of candidate Ma Eun-hyeok should not take place.

The Democratic Party pressured for an immediate appointment, arguing that if an unconstitutional decision is made, there would be no justification for refusing the appointment.

Kim Cheong-yun reports.

[Report]

The People Power Party repeatedly urged the dismissal of the jurisdiction dispute ruling.

They pointed out that there is already a precedent where the Constitutional Court dismissed an individual member's jurisdiction dispute claim, and that the ruling raised unilaterally by Chairman Woo Won-sik without a National Assembly decision should also be dismissed.

[Kwon Seong-dong/People Power Party Floor Leader: "If the Constitutional Court accepts this case, which has many procedural flaws, it will be recorded as a dark history that denies the fairness of the Constitutional Court itself."]

They also stated that even if an unconstitutional decision is made, Acting Prime Minister Choi should refuse the appointment.

Since the core reason for the impeachment of Prime Minister Han Duck-soo was with issues in appointing a Constitutional Court judge, they urged for a quick conclusion on the impeachment trial of Prime Minister Han.

Additionally, they raised concerns about bias, citing candidate Ma's background with the People's Solidarity and the dismissal of charges against the National Assembly's occupied Minju Party aides, claiming that his leftist political ideology influenced the ruling.

The Democratic Party criticized the suspension of candidate Ma's appointment by Acting Prime Minister Choi as a destruction of constitutional order.

They effectively pressured for acceptance, stating that the Constitutional Court should put a stop to such behavior with its jurisdiction dispute ruling tomorrow (Feb. 3).

[Kim Yoon-deok/Democratic Party Secretary General: "There must be a firm ruling against selective appointments of Constitutional Court judges to ensure that the procedures specified in the Constitution and laws are upheld."]

They urged for the immediate appointment of candidate Ma, arguing that if the Constitutional Court makes an unconstitutional decision, Acting Prime Minister Choi would lose justification.

They harshly criticized the People Power Party for crossing the line with extreme right-wing incitement behaviors such as judicial conspiracy and impeachment defiance movements.

The representative of Chairman Woo Won-sik, who filed the jurisdiction dispute, rebutted that there is no regulation stating that the jurisdiction dispute claim must go through a National Assembly decision.

KBS News, Kim Cheong-yun.

■ 제보하기
▷ 카카오톡 : 'KBS제보' 검색, 채널 추가
▷ 전화 : 02-781-1234, 4444
▷ 이메일 : kbs1234@kbs.co.kr
▷ 유튜브, 네이버, 카카오에서도 KBS뉴스를 구독해주세요!


  • Parties divided on judge appointment
    • 입력 2025-02-02 23:40:50
    News 9
[Anchor]

As the decision approaches, the voices of both the ruling and opposition parties have grown louder.

The People Power Party stated that regardless of the Constitutional Court's decision, the appointment of candidate Ma Eun-hyeok should not take place.

The Democratic Party pressured for an immediate appointment, arguing that if an unconstitutional decision is made, there would be no justification for refusing the appointment.

Kim Cheong-yun reports.

[Report]

The People Power Party repeatedly urged the dismissal of the jurisdiction dispute ruling.

They pointed out that there is already a precedent where the Constitutional Court dismissed an individual member's jurisdiction dispute claim, and that the ruling raised unilaterally by Chairman Woo Won-sik without a National Assembly decision should also be dismissed.

[Kwon Seong-dong/People Power Party Floor Leader: "If the Constitutional Court accepts this case, which has many procedural flaws, it will be recorded as a dark history that denies the fairness of the Constitutional Court itself."]

They also stated that even if an unconstitutional decision is made, Acting Prime Minister Choi should refuse the appointment.

Since the core reason for the impeachment of Prime Minister Han Duck-soo was with issues in appointing a Constitutional Court judge, they urged for a quick conclusion on the impeachment trial of Prime Minister Han.

Additionally, they raised concerns about bias, citing candidate Ma's background with the People's Solidarity and the dismissal of charges against the National Assembly's occupied Minju Party aides, claiming that his leftist political ideology influenced the ruling.

The Democratic Party criticized the suspension of candidate Ma's appointment by Acting Prime Minister Choi as a destruction of constitutional order.

They effectively pressured for acceptance, stating that the Constitutional Court should put a stop to such behavior with its jurisdiction dispute ruling tomorrow (Feb. 3).

[Kim Yoon-deok/Democratic Party Secretary General: "There must be a firm ruling against selective appointments of Constitutional Court judges to ensure that the procedures specified in the Constitution and laws are upheld."]

They urged for the immediate appointment of candidate Ma, arguing that if the Constitutional Court makes an unconstitutional decision, Acting Prime Minister Choi would lose justification.

They harshly criticized the People Power Party for crossing the line with extreme right-wing incitement behaviors such as judicial conspiracy and impeachment defiance movements.

The representative of Chairman Woo Won-sik, who filed the jurisdiction dispute, rebutted that there is no regulation stating that the jurisdiction dispute claim must go through a National Assembly decision.

KBS News, Kim Cheong-yun.

이 기사가 좋으셨다면

오늘의 핫 클릭

실시간 뜨거운 관심을 받고 있는 뉴스

이 기사에 대한 의견을 남겨주세요.

수신료 수신료